Volume 6, Issue 3 (Summer 2018)
PCP 2018, 6(3): 153-158 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Lotfi M, Amini M, Fathi A, Karami A, Ghiasi S, Sadeghi S. Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies in Prisoners With Borderline Personality Disorder. PCP 2018; 6 (3) :153-158
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-530-en.html
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-530-en.html
1- Department of Mental Health, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Addiction Department, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ,amini.mh@iums.ac.ir
3- Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Tehran Prisons Office, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Psychology, Tehran Prisons office, Tehran, Iran.
5- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Addiction Department, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ,
3- Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Tehran Prisons Office, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Psychology, Tehran Prisons office, Tehran, Iran.
5- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (5707 Views)
Objective: The main aim of this study was to examine the cognitive emotion regulation strategies among prisoners with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and compare those with the normal population, by achieving the patterns of the implemented strategies between the BPD prisoners.
Methods: Ninety prisoners with BPD and 92 non-clinical individuals participated in this study. A Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-II) was used to diagnosis of BPD, and the cognitive emotion regulation strategies were evaluated by the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). The data were analyzed by independent t test and correlation coefficient via SPSS-16 software.
Results: Independent t-test and correlations analyses showed that cognitive emotion regulation strategies differed in BPD as compared to normal samples, and also showed that self-blame, catastrophization, other blames and rumination strategies exhibited the largest associations with BPD (rs=0.40, 0.38, 0.34 and 0.33, respectively).
Conclusion: The findings showed that the cognitive emotion regulation strategies, especially maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies, had significant relation with BPD symptoms. So, these maladaptive cognitive-emotional components may, therefore, play an essential role in the interventional strategies.
Methods: Ninety prisoners with BPD and 92 non-clinical individuals participated in this study. A Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-II) was used to diagnosis of BPD, and the cognitive emotion regulation strategies were evaluated by the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). The data were analyzed by independent t test and correlation coefficient via SPSS-16 software.
Results: Independent t-test and correlations analyses showed that cognitive emotion regulation strategies differed in BPD as compared to normal samples, and also showed that self-blame, catastrophization, other blames and rumination strategies exhibited the largest associations with BPD (rs=0.40, 0.38, 0.34 and 0.33, respectively).
Conclusion: The findings showed that the cognitive emotion regulation strategies, especially maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies, had significant relation with BPD symptoms. So, these maladaptive cognitive-emotional components may, therefore, play an essential role in the interventional strategies.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Cognitive behavioral
Received: 2017/12/7 | Accepted: 2018/05/12 | Published: 2018/07/1
Received: 2017/12/7 | Accepted: 2018/05/12 | Published: 2018/07/1
References
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
2. Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2010). Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 11-5. [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00255.x] [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00255.x]
3. Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM–5, part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 332-46. [DOI:10.1080/00223891.2011.583808] [DOI:10.1080/00223891.2011.583808]
4. Doering, S., Burgmer, M., Heuft, G., Menke, D., Baumer, B., Lubking, M., et al. (2013). Reliability and validity of the German version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO). BMC Psychiatry, 13, 210. [DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-13-210] [DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-13-210]
5. First, M. B., Gibbon, M., & Spitzer, R. L. (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.
6. Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2007). The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 141-9. [DOI:10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141] [DOI:10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141]
7. Goldberg, D. (2010). The detection and treatment of depression in the physically ill. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 16-20. [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00256.x] [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00256.x]
8. Gratz, K. L., Rosenthal, M. Z., Tull, M. T., Lejuez, C. W., & Gunderson, J. G. (2006). An experimental investigation of emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(4), 850-855. [DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.115.4.850] [DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.115.4.850]
9. Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Handbook of psychological assessment. New York: John Wiley & sons. [PMID] [PMID]
10. Gunderson, J. G., Stout, R. L., McGlashan, T. H., Shea, M. T., Morey, L. C., Carlos M. G., et al. (2011). Ten-year course of borderline personality disorder: psychopathology and function from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(8), 827-37. [DOI:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.37] [DOI:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.37]
11. Hopwood, C. J., Malone, J. C., Ansell, E. B., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., et al. (2011). Personality assessment in DSM-5: Empirical support for rating severity, Style, and Traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(3), 305-20. [DOI:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.305] [DOI:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.305]
12. Hutsebaut, J., Feenstra, D. J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2016). Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a brief self-report questionnaire for the assessment of the DSM-5 level of personality functioning scale: The LPFS brief form (LPFS-BF). Personality Disorders, 7(2), 192-7. [DOI:10.1037/per0000159] [DOI:10.1037/per0000159]
13. Hutsebaut, J., Kamphuis, J. H., Feenstra, D. J., Weekers, L. C., & De Saeger, H. (2017). Assessing DSM-5-oriented level of personality functioning: Development and psychometric evaluation of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1). Personality Disorders, 8(1), 94-101. [DOI:10.1037/per0000197] [DOI:10.1037/per0000197]
14. Jablensky, A. (2010). Psychiatry in crisis? Back to fundamentals. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 29. [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00258.x] [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00258.x]
15. Katschnig, H. (2010). Are psychiatrists an endangered species? Observations on internal and external challenges to the profession. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 21-8. [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00257.x] [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00257.x]
16. Kim, S., Sharp, C., & Carbone, C. (2014). The protective role of attachment security for adolescent borderline personality disorder features via enhanced positive emotion regulation strategies. Personality Disorders, 5(2), 125-36. [DOI:10.1037/per0000038] [DOI:10.1037/per0000038]
17. Koenigsberg, H. W., Fan, J., Ochsner, K. N., Liu, X., Guise, K., Pizzarello, S., et al. (2010). Neural correlates of using distancing to regulate emotional responses to social situations. Neuropsychologia, 48(6), 1813-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.002] [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.002]
18. Lotfi, M., Amini, M., Fathi, A., Karami, A., & Ghiasi, S. (2014). Personality traits, emotion regulation and impulsive behaviors in patients with borderline personality disorder. Practice in Clinical Psychology, 2(1), 27-33.
19. Maj, M. (2010). Are psychiatrists an endangered species? World Psychiatry, 9(1), 1-2. [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00253.x] [DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00253.x]
20. Millon, T., Grossman, S., Millon, C., Meagher, S., & Ramnath, R. (2004). Personality disorders in modern life (Vol. 1). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
21. Mohammadkhani, P., Jokar, M., Jahani-tabesh, O., & Tamannaei-far, S. (2011). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (Persian Version). Tehran: Danjeh. [PMCID] [PMCID]
22. Morey, L. C. (2017). Application of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale by Lay Raters. Journal of Personality Disorders, 1-12. [DOI:10.1521/pedi_2017_31_305] [DOI:10.1521/pedi_2017_31_305]
23. Morey, Leslie. (2017). Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM-5 level of personality functioning scale. Psychological Assessment, 29(10), 1302-8. [DOI:10.1037/pas0000450] [DOI:10.1037/pas0000450]
24. Putnam, K. M., & Silk, K. R. (2005). Emotion dysregulation and the development of borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 17(4), 899-925. [DOI:10.1017/S0954579405050431] [PMID] [DOI:10.1017/S0954579405050431]
25. Sadock, B. J., Kaplan, H. I., & Sadock, V. A. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/clinical Psychiatry. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
26. Skodol, A. E., Clark, L. A., Bender, D. S., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., et al. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: Description and rationale. Personality Disorders, 2(1), 4-22. [DOI:10.1037/a0021891] [DOI:10.1037/a0021891]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
