Volume 4, Issue 4 (Autumn 2016-- 2016)                   PCP 2016, 4(4): 237-248 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alsadat Makkiyan R, Malekitabar M, Farahbakhsh K. Attachment Styles and Self-Efficacy in Blind and Non-blind Female High School Students. PCP 2016; 4 (4) :237-248
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-439-en.html
1- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. , mahmood3659@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (5499 Views)

Objective: The present study aimed at investigating the relationship between attachment styles and self-efficacy in blind and non-blind female high school students in Tehran.
Methods: The statistical population consisted of all female students studying in grades one or two in Tehran girl’s high schools, in the academic year 2014. The study design was causal-comparative, conducted on 120 subjects consisting of 60 blind girls selected through convenient sampling method and 60 non-blind girls selected through randomized clustering sampling method. Data were collected through two questionnaires of attachment styles of Collins and Read (1990) (RAAS) and self-efficacy scale (SEQ-C) of Muris. To analyze the data, descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multivariate analysis of variance) were used.
Results: The study results indicated a significant difference between blind and non-blind students’ efficacy and attachment styles. Avoidance attachment style as well as emotional, social, and public efficacy of these two groups revealed no significant difference. Moreover, the results indicated a significant difference between anxiety attachment style and emotional, social, and public efficacy of these two groups (P>0.05). Finally, a significant difference was observed between secure attachment style and emotional, social, and general efficacy of blind and non-blind students.
Conclusion: The blind and non-blind students are significantly different with regard to anxiety and secure attachment styles. However, their emotional, social, and academic self- efficacy seems to be the same. Although there was a significant difference between blind and non-blind students with regard to attachment styles, a significant association was seen between different dimensions of self-efficacy of blind and non-blind students (P<0.05).

Full-Text [PDF 764 kb]   (4431 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Cognitive behavioral
Received: 2016/02/2 | Accepted: 2016/07/16 | Published: 2016/10/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb