Volume 11, Issue 1 (Winter 2023)                   PCP 2023, 11(1): 81-92 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghorbanikhah E, Mohammadyfar M A, Moradi S, Delavarpour M. The Effectiveness of Acceptance-and-Commitment-Based Parenting Training on Mood and Anxiety in Children and Self-compassion in Parents. PCP 2023; 11 (1) :81-92
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-847-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
2- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. , alimohammadyfar@semnan.ac.ir
3- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 663 kb]   (618 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1912 Views)
Full-Text:   (454 Views)
1. Introduction
The global prevalence of depression and anxiety in children is estimated to range from 2.6% to 6.5% (Lindberg et al., 2020), and this rate is increasing (Charlson et al., 2019). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), depression and anxiety are among the top 5 causes of overall burden disease among children (Wegner et al., 2020; World Health Organization, 2018). Symptoms of depression and clinically related depressive disorders in children can have a significant negative impact on a person’s psychosocial development (Ravens-Sieberer et al., 2007).
Common interventions for depression are medication and psychotherapy (Ryan, 2005). For example, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the common pharmacological interventions for clinical depression; however, they have various side effects, such as weight gain and hypertension (Helmich et al., 2010). The side effect of these medications is similar in adults and children (Westergren et al., 2020).
Alongside depression, anxiety impacts children’s lives as a negative emotion. Anxious children are more prone to psychological disorders, such as depression, anxiety disorders, and substance abuse later in life (Carnes et al., 2019). Also, anxiety can lead to negative impacts on many aspects of their life, including social, educational, and familial (Brendel & Maynard, 2014). Furthermore, childhood anxiety has a high comorbidity with depression, both of which lead to vulnerability in a critical period of life (Adler Nevo et al., 2014; James et al., 2015). Parents are important in the formation and maintenance of a child’s anxiety through maladaptive strategies (Brendel & Maynard, 2014; Ginsburg & Schlossberg, 2002; Maid et al., 2008). The results of a meta-analysis performed by Brendel (Brendel & Maynard, 2014) showed that parent-child interventions appear more effective in treating childhood anxiety than child-focused individual and group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).
Parents’ psychopathology can be related to parenting and the psychopathology of the children (Berg-Nielsen et al., 2002; Vostanis et al., 2006). One of the important factors in the psychological health of parents is self-compassion. Self-compassion is the ability to treat oneself with care and understanding, have a nonjudgmental understanding of inadequacies, accepting that imperfections and failures are normal and common aspects of humans (K. Neff, 2003). Self-compassion is an equally important or more effective target of intervention in improving parents’ and children’s mental health (Gouveia et al., 2016; Jefferson et al., 2020). Self-compassion of parents is correlated with parenting quality, parental stress, child-directed criticism, and authoritarian or permissive parenting (Gouveia et al., 2016; Jefferson et al., 2020; Psychogiou et al., 2016).
Parenting programs are interventions that enhance the role of parenting in improving children’s symptoms and health. These programs change the way parents relate to their children by changing parental beliefs, feelings, and behaviors in the moment-to-moment interchanges (Scott & Gardner, 2015). There are many parenting programs, such as positive parenting, CBT, mindful parenting, and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based parenting. Mindfulness-based interventions, when compared to CBT, can be an alternative approach for parents. Mindfulness-based interventions have various advantages, such as having a relatively simple approach compared to CBT. 
ACT incorporates mindfulness and decreases experiential avoidance while increasing psychological flexibility (Brown et al., 2014; Hayes et al., 2006). In the context of parenting, ACT increases psychological flexibility and parental adjustment that lead to improving child behavior, while reducing dysfunctional parenting style (Whittingham et al., 2019). Parents are also equipped with new coping strategies along with psychological flexibility, non-judgmental attention to moment-to-moment experiences, and acceptance of internal and external experiences that make their reactions more adaptive (Brown et al., 2014; Sairanen et al., 2019). Furthermore, parents’ cognition and cognitive fusion (for instance, “I cannot deal with my child.”) are critical to the development and maintenance of maladaptive parenting, especially in contact with children (Coyne & Wilson, 2004). Cognitive fusion increases experiential avoidance and narrows the parent’s behavioral repertoire, resulting in impractical behavioral patterns over time (Coyne & Wilson, 2004; Gould et al., 2018).
Depression and anxiety at early ages lead to many problems in all aspects of life. There are different approaches to parenting that all have a good effect on the child’s upbringing; however, the problem is that parents’ instability in techniques is because of the control of thoughts and feelings that lead to an increased need to learn a new technique and increase new parenting skills. Moreover, many studies have shown the efficacy of ACT for treating adult psychopathologies, such as depression and anxiety; nonetheless, there are fewer empirical studies on child populations (Swain et al., 2015). Therefore, further research is needed to examine the effectiveness of new and effective parenting approaches, such as ACT. Using this program in clinical practice can be useful for clinicians, parents, and children. Accordingly, the present study investigates the effectiveness of ACT-based parenting on mood and anxiety in children and self-compassion in parents.

2. Materials and Methods
Study participants 
This was an experimental study that was conducted in 2021 in the Islamic Azad University of Semnan Branch, Semnan City, Iran. The participants included mothers who had children in the age range of 5 to 7 years with depression and anxiety in Tehran City, Iran. The purposive sampling method was used to collect the participants. In this regard, semi-structured interviews with mothers were conducted to evaluate the selection criteria in addition to completing the child anxiety and depression scale (parent form) to determine children’s anxiety and depression. The sample size was calculated using the G*Power software with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and considering the effect size of 0.50, α of 0.05, and power of 0.80 in 34 participants of control and intervention groups.
Intervention protocol
The participants in the ACT-based parenting group were trained based on the ACT parenting program manual (Butler, 2015; Coyne & Murrell, 2009). ACT is composed of eight 2-h weekly group sessions, which were conducted for 2 months. 
Study measures
Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale, Parent Short Version
The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale, Parent short version (RCADS-P-25) was developed by Ebesutani et al. (Ebesutani et al., 2017). This scale has 25 terms and examines the components of anxiety and depression. This questionnaire is scored based on the Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3. The scale has a high internal consistency with Cronbach α of 0.83 for the depression subscale and 0.86 for the anxiety subscale. In another study conducted in Iran, the Cronbach α values for the total scores were reported at 0.92, and for anxiety and depression were obtained at 0.90 and 0.82, respectively (Rasouli & Minaei, 2017). 
The Self-Compassion Scale
The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) has 26 questions, rated on a 5-point Likert scale (K. D. Neff, 2003). SCS yields an overall score and includes 6 subscales as follows: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. The total scores are calculated by summing all 26 items (scores of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification subscales are reversed), and higher scores indicate greater self-compassion (K. D. Neff, 2003). In a study by Neff (K. D. Neff, 2003), the internal consistency reliability of the 6 subscales was reported to range from 0.75 to 0.81, and the total score was obtained at 0.92. In another study conducted in Iran, the Cronbach α values for the total scores were reported at 0.70. Meanwhile, the test-retest reliability was obtained at 0.89 (MOMENI et al., 2014).
Study procedure
The participants included mothers who had children in the age range of 5 to 7 years who had depression and anxiety in Tehran City, Iran. The purposive sampling method was used to select the participants. They signed an informed consent letter. To reduce the dropout rate from the study, a complete explanation was given regarding the treatment conditions, the number of sessions, and the randomization of the treatment and control groups. Furthermore, to prevent dropout, the participants were thoroughly examined in terms of having enough time to attend the intervention sessions and the possibility of presence during the sessions. 
Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were signing the informed consent letter to participate in the research and along with a written consent; scoring above 25 in the RCADS-P-25; having 5 to 7 years of age for the children; having 18 to 50 years of age for the mothers; and having an education level of at least a diploma for mothers.
Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria were passing all the criteria for personality disorders and cases of interpersonal problems that interfere with group work, the existence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the child, having a history of severe mental disorders (psychosis, delirium, cognitive disorders) or recent drug abuse in the mother, having participated in a psychological intervention at the same time as the study, and having received psychological treatment in the past 6 months.
After the registration of all participants, they were randomly allocated to ACT-based parenting and control groups by a simple randomization method.
Data analysis
We used the SPSS software, version 24 to analyze the data. To compare the demographic variables and differences between groups, the Chi-square test was used (see Table 1). Moreover, to evaluate differences in clinical characteristics between groups at pre-intervention, we used the independent t test. To evaluate the normality of variables, the Levene test of equality of variance was used. Finally, analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) and the repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare the intervention and the control groups on depression, anxiety, and self-compassion. 




3. Results
As shown in the study flow diagram (Figure 1), of the 34 participants, 32 completed the post-test and follow-up (16 in each group).



One participant in each group did not complete the final analysis. The Chi-square test indicated that both groups were similar in terms of demographic variables (Table 1). The independent t test also indicated that both groups were similar in clinical characteristics at baseline (Table 2). Moreover, the Levene test for equality of variances (Table 2) revealed that depression, anxiety, and self-compassion in both groups were normally distributed (P>0.05).



The Mean±SD of depression (Table 3) in the intervention group at the baseline measure was 16.50±0.89, which decreased to 2.94±3.27 in post measure, and 2.25±3.35 in the follow-up.



Table 4 shows the comparison of outcome measures based on ANCOVA.



According to the presented data in Table 4 and Table 5, depression scores were significantly reduced in the intervention group from pre-test to post-test and follow-up. The effect size (Table 5) was 0.86 in the post-measure and 0.87 in the follow-up (P<0.001). Table 5 also demonstrates the results of repeated measures ANOVA to compare the changes in clinical symptoms by considering the time (baseline, post-intervention, and endpoint) and time×group. 



The results of the repeated measure ANOVA for depression scores (Table 5) were F=153.48 and P<0.001, with an effect size of 0.83. The within-subject test results were F=137.26 and P<0.001 with an effect size = 0.82. In other words, the intervention group showed significant changes in depression over time.
The results also show that anxiety scores were significantly reduced in the intervention group from pre-test to post-test and follow-up (P<0.001). The Mean±SD of anxiety at baseline was 18.19±1.87, which significantly decreased to 7.63±4.34 at post measure, and 7.06±4.52 at follow-up. The effect size (based on ANCOVA results) was 0.48 at post-measure and 0.52 at follow-up (P<0.001).
The repeated measures ANOVA for anxiety score, with treatment as within-subjects factors, found a main effect of time (F=74.81, P<0.001, effect size=0.71) and a significant group×time interaction (F=26.06, P<0.001, effect size=0.46).
The results also showed that the total scores of self-compassions with positive subscales, including self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness have increased in the intervention group (P<0.001). Total self-compassion in the intervention group was 56.43±3.14 at baseline, which significantly improved to 97.18±3.72 at post-test, and 98.25±4.76 at follow-up (P<0.001).
Additionally, the Mean±SD of self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness were respectively 10.50±1.31, 9.93±1.12, and 9.62±1.45 at baseline measure, which significantly improved to 17.81±1.55, 15.50±1.31, and 15.43±1.75 after the intervention, and 18.93±2.08, 15.25±1.77, and 15.18±1.47 after a 3-month follow-up (P<0.001).
Furthermore, the scores of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification in the intervention group were respectively 21.18±1.60, 12.43±0.81, and 15.93±1.69 at baseline, which significantly decreased to 12.18±1.32, 8.12±1.40, and 9.31±1.13 after the intervention, and 11.75±1.34, 8.50±1.54, and 8.87±1.45 at follow-up (P<0.001). 
The effect size for total self-compassion was 0.97 post-intervention and 0.94 at the 3-month follow-up. For self-kindness, common humanity, mindfulness, self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, the effect size was respectively 0.80, 0.85, 0.77, 0.90, 0.74, and 0.87 at post-intervention, and 0.81, 0.76, 0.79, 0.91, 0.78, and 0.88 at the 3-month follow-up. Moreover, the observed power was one for all self-compassion subscales. 
Additionally, the results of repeated measures ANOVA for the total score of self-compassion, with treatment as within-subjects factors, found a main effect of time (P<0.001 and effect size=0.94) and a significant group×time interaction (P<0.001 and effect size=0.92).

4. Discussion
This study examined the effectiveness of ACT-based parenting on depression and anxiety in children and self-compassion in parents. The results showed statistically significant changes in depression and anxiety in children and self-compassion in parents compared to the control group. Symptoms of anxiety significantly declined in the experimental group after the intervention and follow-up. These findings were similar to the results of previous research on the ACT in treating children’s anxiety (Burke, 2010; Hancock et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2008; Semple et al., 2010). Additionally, symptoms of depression improved in the intervention group after the intervention and follow-up. These findings are comparable to other similar studies on depression in children, such as the study by Moghanloo et al. (Moghanloo et al., 2015), which indicated that ACT was effective for depression in children with diabetes in the age range of 7 to 15 years. Furthermore, the self-compassion scores of parents significantly changed in the ACT group. These results were comparable to other studies on acceptance-based interventions on self-compassion, such as the study by Yadavaia et al. (Yadavaia et al., 2014), which showed that self-compassion improved in the ACT group. 
These changes can be explained by the processes of ACT. From the ACT perspective, experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility in parents lead to maladaptive parenting behaviors that influence the child’s psycho-emotional development and psychopathology (Flujas-Contreras & Gómez, 2018; Whittingham, 2014). In contrast, the parent’s psychological flexibility is associated with adaptive parenting practices and leads to decreased internalization problems in children, such as depression and anxiety (Brassell et al., 2016). Additionally, parents learned to be mindful of daily moments and include the time of interaction with their children. Mindfulness has been described as an individual’s characteristic of having nonjudgmental awareness of one’s present moment internal (thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations) and external experiences (Kabat-Zinn, 2009). Mindfulness increases emotional awareness and emotion regulation skills that decrease stress and mood dysfunction (Bishop et al., 2004; Khazraee et al., 2018). Furthermore, mindfulness brings moment-to-moment awareness to the parent-child relationship, increases self-regulation in the parent, and brings compassion and nonjudgmental acceptance to their parenting interactions (Duncan et al., 2009). Finally, values-directed behavior helps parents create a meaningful life while in contact with their children (Whittingham & Coyne, 2019).

5. Conclusion 
According to this study, ACT-based parenting is an effective intervention in treating depression and anxiety in children. The results also support the potential utility of the ACT parenting model for improving the self-compassion of parents. This approach provides a promising basis for further therapy development and challenges us to reconsider the parenting experience. Furthermore, this study reinforces the value of an ACT parenting intervention in improving parent and child outcomes.
Study limitations 
One limitation was the gender of the parents in the study sample. All parents were female and this led to the limited interpretation of results to the other gender parents. Another limitation was the relatively small sample size. Future investigations should attempt to replicate and extend these results and tests of generalizability to other parents’ genders and have a bigger sample size. Furthermore, the study’s strength was an evaluation of the efficacy of a new intervention and techniques in the field of parenting. 

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines

The Research Committee of the Azad University of Semnan branch, Semnan City, Iran, approved this study (Code No.: IR.IAU.SEMNAN.REC.1400.024).

Funding
This research was conducted as a doctoral dissertation in a general psychology and research project (Code: 162406226) in the Azad University of Semnan branch, Semnan City, Iran. 

Authors' contributions
All authors equally contributed to preparing this article.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.


References
Adler Nevo, G. W., Avery, D., Fiksenbaum, L., Kiss, A., Mendlowitz, S., & Monga, S., et al. (2014). Eight years later: Outcomes of CBTtreated versus untreated anxious children. Brain and Behavior, 4(5), 765-774. [DOI:10.1002/brb3.274] [PMID] [PMCID]
Berg-Nielsen, T. S., Vikan, A., & Dahl, A. A. (2002). Parenting related to child and parental psychopathology: A descriptive review of the literature. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7(4), 529-552. [DOI:10.1177/1359104502007004006]
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., & Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. [DOI:10.1093/clipsy.bph077]
Brassell, A. A., Rosenberg, E., Parent, J., Rough, J. N., Fondacaro, K., & Seehuus, M. (2016). Parent’s psychological flexibility: Associations with parenting and child psychosocial well-being. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(2), 111-120. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.03.001]
Brendel, K. E., & Maynard, B. R. (2014). Child-parent interventions for childhood anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(3), 287-295. [DOI:10.1177/1049731513503713]
Brown, F. L., Whittingham, K., Boyd, R. N., McKinlay, L., & Sofronoff, K. (2014). Improving child and parenting outcomes following paediatric acquired brain injury: A randomised controlled trial of Stepping Stones Triple P plus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(10), 1172-1183. [DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12227] [PMID]
Burke, C. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: A preliminary review of current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(2), 133-144. [DOI:10.1007/s10826-009-9282-x]
Butler, K. (2015). Parenting programs in the ACT. Families ACT. [Link]
Carnes, A., Matthewson, M., & Boer, O. (2019). The contribution of parents in childhood anxiety treatment: A metaanalytic review. Clinical Psychologist, 23(3), 183-195. [DOI:10.1111/cp.12179]
Charlson, F., van Ommeren, M., Flaxman, A., Cornett, J., Whiteford, H., & Saxena, S. (2019). New WHO prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England), 394(10194), 240–248. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30934-1] [PMID]
Coyne, L., & Murrell, A. (2009). The joy of parenting: An acceptance and commitment therapy guide to effective parenting in the early years. California: New Harbinger Publications. [Link]
Coyne, L. W., & Wilson, K. G. (2004). The ole of cognitive fusion in impaired parenting: An RFT analysis. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4(3), 469-486. [Link]
Duncan, L. G., Coatsworth, J. D., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). A model of mindful parenting: Implications for parent-child relationships and prevention research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 12(3), 255-270. [DOI:10.1007/s10567-009-0046-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
Ebesutani, C., Korathu-Larson, P., Nakamura, B. J., Higa-McMillan, C., & Chorpita, B. (2017). The revised child anxiety and depression scale 25-parent version: Scale development and validation in a school-based and clinical sample. Assessment, 24(6), 712-728. [DOI:10.1177/1073191115627012] [PMID]
Flujas-Contreras, J. M., & Gómez, I. (2018). Improving flexible parenting with acceptance and commitment therapy: A case study. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 8, 29-35. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.02.006]
Ginsburg, G. S., & Schlossberg, M. C. (2002). Family-based treatment of childhood anxiety disorders. International Review of Psychiatry, 14(2), 143-154. [DOI:10.1080/09540260220132662]
Gould, E. R., Tarbox, J., & Coyne, L. (2018). Evaluating the effects of acceptance and commitment training on the overt behavior of parents of children with autism. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 7, 81-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.06.003]
Gouveia, M., Carona, C., Canavarro, M., & Moreira, H. (2016). Self-compassion and dispositional mindfulness are associated with parenting styles and parenting stress: The mediating role of mindful parenting. Mindfulness, 7(3), 700-712. [DOI:10.1007/s12671-016-0507-y]
Hancock, K. M., Swain, J., Hainsworth, C. J., Dixon, A. L., Koo, S., & Munro, K. (2018). Acceptance and commitment therapy versus cognitive behavior therapy for children with anxiety: Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 47(2), 296-311. [DOI:10.1080/15374416.2015.1110822] [PMID]
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006] [PMID]
Helmich, I., Latini, A., Sigwalt, A., Carta, M. G., Machado, S., & Velasques, B., et al. (2010). Neurobiological alterations induced by exercise and their impact on depressive disorders [corrected]. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH, 6, 115–125. [PMID] [PMCID]
James, A. C., James, G., Cowdrey, F. A., Soler, A., & Choke, A. (2015). Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(2), CD004690. [PMID] [PMCID]
Jefferson, F. A., Shires, A., & McAloon, J. (2020). Parenting self-compassion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 11(9), 2067-2088. [DOI:10.1007/s12671-020-01401-x]
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2009). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hachette Books.
Khazraee, H., Omidi, A., Kakhki, R. D., Zanjani, Z., & Sehat, M. (2018). Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in cognitive emotion regulation strategies, headache-related disability, and headache intensity in patients with chronic daily headache. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 20(S1), e57151. [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.57151]
Lee, J., Semple, R. J., Rosa, D., & Miller, L. (2008). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for children: Results of a pilot study. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 22(1), 15-28. [DOI:10.1891/0889.8391.22.1.15]
Lindberg, L., Hagman, E., Danielsson, P., Marcus, C., & Persson, M. (2020). Anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with obesity: A nationwide study in Sweden. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 30. [PMID] [PMCID]
Maid, R., Smokowski, P., & Bacallao, M. (2008). Family treatment of childhood anxiety. Child & Family Social Work, 13(4), 433-442. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00574.x]
Ataie Moghanloo, V., Ataie Moghanloo, R., & Moazezi, M. (2015). Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy for depression, psychological well-being and feeling of guilt in 7-15 years old diabetic children. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, 25(4), e2436. [DOI:10.5812/ijp.2436] [PMID] [PMCID]
Momeni, F., Shahidi, S., Mootabi, F., & Heydari, M. (2014). [Psychometric properties of a Farsi version of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) (Persian)]. Contemporary Psychology, 8(2), 27-40. [Link]
Neff, K. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85-101. [DOI:10.1080/15298860309032]
Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223-250. [DOI:10.1080/15298860309027]
Psychogiou, L., Legge, K., Parry, E., Mann, J., Nath, S., & Ford, T., et al. (2016). Self-compassion and parenting in mothers and fathers with depression. Mindfulness, 7, 896-908. [PMID] [PMCID]
Rasouli, H., & Minaei, A. (2017). [Reliability of the revised version of children’s depression anxiety scale (Persian)]. Paper presented at: 8th International Conference on Psychology and Social Sciences, Tehran, Iran, 22 July 2017. [Link]
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Wille, N., Bettge, S., & Erhart, M. (2007). [Mental health of children and adolescents in Germany. Results from the BELLA study within the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) (German)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 50(5-6), 871–878. [PMID]
Ryan, N. D. (2005). Treatment of depression in children and adolescents. Lancet (London, England), 366(9489), 933–940. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67321-7] [PMID]
Sairanen, E., Lappalainen, R., Lappalainen, P., Kaipainen, K., Carlstedt, F., & Anclair, M., et al. (2019). Effectiveness of a web-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention for wellbeing of parents whose children have chronic conditions: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 13, 94-102. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.07.004]
Scott, S., & Gardner, F. (2015). Parenting programs. In A. Thapar, D. S. Pine, J. F. Leckman,  S. Cott, M. J. Snowling, & E. Taylor (Eds.), Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (pp. 483-495). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [DOI:10.1002/9781118381953.ch37]
Semple, R. J., Lee, J., Rosa, D., & Miller, L. F. (2010). A randomized trial of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for children: Promoting mindful attention to enhance social-emotional resiliency in children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(2), 218-229. [DOI:10.1007/s10826-009-9301-y]
Swain, J., Hancock, K., Dixon, A., & Bowman, J. (2015). Acceptance and commitment therapy for children: A systematic review of intervention studies. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(2), 73-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.02.001]
Vostanis, P., Graves, A., Meltzer, H., Goodman, R., Jenkins, R., & Brugha, T. (2006). Relationship between parental psychopathology, parenting strategies and child mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41(7), 509-514. [DOI:10.1007/s00127-006-0061-3] [PMID]
Wegner, M., Amatriain-Fernández, S., Kaulitzky, A., Murillo-Rodriguez, E., Machado, S., & Budde, H. (2020). Systematic review of meta-analyses: Exercise effects on depression in children and adolescents. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 81. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00081] [PMID] [PMCID]
Westergren, T., Narum, S., & Klemp, M. (2020). Adverse effects information in clinical guidelines on pharmacological treatment of depression in children and adolescents: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 10(7), e036412. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036412] [PMID] [PMCID]
Whittingham, K. (2014). Parenting in context. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3(3), 212-215. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.01.001]
Whittingham, K., & Coyne, L. (2019). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The clinician’s guide for supporting parents. Academic Press. [Link]
Whittingham, K., Sanders, M. R., McKinlay, L., & Boyd, R. N. (2019). Parenting intervention combined with acceptance and commitment therapy: Processes of change. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(6), 1673-1680. [DOI:10.1007/s10826-019-01386-9]
World Health Organization. (2018). Adolescent mental health in the European Region. Geneva:World Health Organization. [Link]
Yadavaia JE, Hayes SC, Vilardaga R. (2014). Using acceptance and commitment therapy to increase self-compassion: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3(4), 248-257. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.09.002] [PMID] [PMCID]
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Cognitive behavioral
Received: 2022/08/28 | Accepted: 2022/10/17 | Published: 2023/01/14

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb