Shams G, Abasi I, Youssefi Y. Cultural Issues in Understanding Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: Nature, Appraisals, and Control Strategies of Unwanted Intrusive Thoughts in Iranian Nonclinical Population. PCP 2020; 8 (2) :73-84
URL:
http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-708-en.html
1- Department of Psychiatry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , abasi@sbmu.ac.ir
Abstract: (3290 Views)
Objective: Recent developments in cognitive models of obsessive-compulsive disorder posits that nearly everyone experiences unwanted intrusive thoughts, images, and impulses from time to time. The intrusions are not particularly a problematic issue; it is more probably an interpretation or attempts to control in maladaptive or unrealistic ways. So, the present article aimed to assess the nature, prevalence, appraisal, and control strategies of intrusions in the Iranian population.
Methods: We employed the international intrusive thoughts interview schedule in a sample of Iranian university students (n=50) selected by the convenient sampling method.
Results: Nearly all participants (100%) reported experiencing at least one type of unwanted intrusive thoughts during the previous three months. The highest prevalence of Unwanted Intrusive Thoughts (UITs) belonged to the doubt category, and a large proportion of other UITs were also detected. However, the lowest prevalence of UITs was observed in the sexual and victim categories, respectively. In all of the UIT categories, support for the importance of removing and frequency had the highest mean levels. The highest mean level of endorsement for frequency was for the doubt category. Victim category had the highest mean level for the importance of removing and mean levels of interference/distress, and difficulty removing were higher in the contamination category. Participants endorsed intolerance of anxiety, uncertainty, and responsibility more as a reason that they noticed the thought. Participants were more likely to use thought replacement, distraction, self-reassurance, and avoidance as thought control strategies. The results are discussed in terms of Iranian culture.
Conclusion: Unwanted intrusive thoughts are reported by the majority of individuals in all countries, and significant cross-cultural differences, which are apparent in primary intrusive thought content, appraisals, and control strategies, are specifically related to obsessive-compulsive symptoms distress.
Full-Text [PDF 702 kb]
(1902 Downloads)
| |
Full-Text (HTML) (1420 Views)
● Nearly all participants reported experiencing at least one type of unwanted intrusive thoughts.
● The highest and lowest prevalence of unwanted intrusive thoughts belonged the doubt category and the sexual and victim categories, respectively.
● Participants reported more intolerance of anxiety, uncertainty, and responsibility as thought reappraisals.
● Participants used more thought replacement, distraction, self-reassurance, and avoidance as thought control strategies
Plain Language Summary
Unwanted intrusive thoughts are found in clinical obsessive and nonclinical people. They are essentially similar in content but are different in their processing. In other words, intrusions are not problematic, rather the ways we react to, interpret, appraise, and or attempt to control them can cause distress. So, the present study investigated prevalence, appraisal, and control strategies of intrusions in the Iranian population. The International Intrusive Thoughts Interview Schedule (IITIS) was implemented in a sample of Iranian university students (n=50). Results showed nearly all participants reported experiencing at least one type of unwanted intrusive thoughts. The highest prevalence of Unwanted Intrusive Thoughts belonged to the doubt category, and the lowest prevalence of UITs was observed in the sexual and victim categories. Participants reported intolerance of anxiety, uncertainty, and responsibility more as a reason for noticing intrusions and they also were more likely to use thought replacement, distraction, self-reassurance, and avoidance for controlling intrusions. The results showed that unwanted intrusive thoughts, responses to these thoughts (thought reappraisals) and strategies to control them in Iranian- nonclinical population are almost similar to these in clinical OCD population. There were also some significant cross-cultural differences in prevalence, appraisal, and control strategies of unwanted intrusive thoughts.
Type of Study:
Research |
Subject:
Cognitive behavioral Received: 2019/12/10 | Accepted: 2020/02/15 | Published: 2020/04/1