Volume 6, Issue 3 (Summer 2018)
PCP 2018, 6(3): 175-182 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mohammadi Z, Pourshahbaz A, Poshtmashhadi M, Dolatshahi B, Barati F, Zarei M. Psychometric Properties of the Young Mania Rating Scale as a Mania Severity Measure in Patients With Bipolar I Disorder. PCP 2018; 6 (3) :175-182
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-552-en.html
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-552-en.html
Zahra Mohammadi * 
1, Abbas Pourshahbaz2 
, Marjan Poshtmashhadi2 , Behrooz Dolatshahi2 , Fatemeh Barati2 , Majid Zarei2
1, Abbas Pourshahbaz2 , Marjan Poshtmashhadi2 , Behrooz Dolatshahi2 , Fatemeh Barati2 , Majid Zarei2
1- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran , zahra.mohammadi412@gmail.com
2- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (9186 Views)
Objective: The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Young Mania Rating Scale.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 65 patients with bipolar I disorder in the manic phase and 145 healthy individuals. The patients were selected from the Razi Psychiatric Hospital and Taleghani Hospital, while the controls were selected from the general population of Tehran, using a purposive sampling method. Data were collected using the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and analyzed using SPSS-23 and AMOS-24.
Results: Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure for the YMRS. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.72 indicated the acceptable reliability of YMRS. The cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity of the YMRS were found to be 12.5, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the study results, YMRS showed adequate psychometric properties in the Iranian population. Therefore, it can be considered as a valuable instrument in screening patients with bipolar disorder in the manic phase.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 65 patients with bipolar I disorder in the manic phase and 145 healthy individuals. The patients were selected from the Razi Psychiatric Hospital and Taleghani Hospital, while the controls were selected from the general population of Tehran, using a purposive sampling method. Data were collected using the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and analyzed using SPSS-23 and AMOS-24.
Results: Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure for the YMRS. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.72 indicated the acceptable reliability of YMRS. The cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity of the YMRS were found to be 12.5, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the study results, YMRS showed adequate psychometric properties in the Iranian population. Therefore, it can be considered as a valuable instrument in screening patients with bipolar disorder in the manic phase.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Psychometric
Received: 2018/02/17 | Accepted: 2018/05/12 | Published: 2018/07/1
Received: 2018/02/17 | Accepted: 2018/05/12 | Published: 2018/07/1
References
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). New York: American Psychiatric Association. [DOI:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596] [DOI:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
2. Amini, H., Sharifi, V., Asadi, S., Mohammadi, M. R., Kaviani, H., Semnani, Y., et al. (2008). Validity of the Iranian version of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I) in the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders. Payesh, 7(1), 49-57.
3. Bergeson, J. G., Kalsekar, I., Jing, Y., You, M., Forbes, R. A., & Hebden, T. (2012). Medical care costs and hospitalization in patients with bipolar disorder treated with atypical antipsychotics. American Health & Drug Benefits, 5(6), 379-86. [PMID] [PMCID] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Birmaher, B. (2013). Bipolar disorder in children and adolescents. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 18(3), 140–148.[DOI:10.1111/camh.12021] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1111/camh.12021]
5. Bull, P. (2017). Rating scales and safety measurements in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia–a reference guide. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 47(3), 77-109. [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Colom, F., Vieta, E., Martínez-Arán, A., Garcia-Garcia, M., Reinares, M., Torrent, C., et al. (2002). [Spanish version of a scale for the assessment of mania: validity and reliability of the Young Mania Rating Scale (Spanish)]. Medicina Clínica, 119(10), 366–71. [DOI:10.1016/S0025-7753(02)73419-2] [DOI:10.1016/S0025-7753(02)73419-2]
7. Ebrahimi, A., Kheyr, Z., Nasiri, H., & Barnamanesh, A. (2017). [Reliability, validity, factor and discrimination power analysis of young mania rating scale among unipolar, bipolar depression and healthy people (Persian)]. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal, 16(3), 333-44.
8. Enderami, A., Monesi, F., & Zarghami, M. (2017). One-year follow-up of patients with a diagnosis of first episode psychosis. Materia Socio Medica, 29(1), 21. [DOI:10.5455/msm.2017.29.21-25] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.5455/msm.2017.29.21-25]
9. Favre, S., Aubry, J., Gex-Fabry, M., Ragama-Pardos, E., McQuillan, A., & Bertschy, G. (2003). Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). L'Encephale, 29(6), 499-505. [PMID] [PMID]
10. Gupta, S. C., Sinha, V. K., Praharaj, S. K., & Gandotra, S. (2009). Factor structure of manic symptoms. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(12), 1141–6.[DOI:10.3109/00048670903279853] [PMID] [DOI:10.3109/00048670903279853]
11. Hanwella, R., & de Silva, V. A. (2011). Signs and symptoms of acute mania: a factor analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 11(1), 137.[DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-11-137] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-11-137]
12. Karadağ, F., Oral, T., Yalcin, F. A., & Erten E. (2002). [Reliability and validity of Turkish translation of young mania rating scale (Turkish)]. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 13(2), 107-14. [PMID] [PMID]
13. Kongsakon, R., & Bhatanaprabhabhan, D. (2005). Validity and reliability of the Young Mania Rating Scale: Thai version. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 88(11), 1598-604. [PMID] [PMID]
14. Miller, C. J., Johnson, S. L., & Eisner, L. (2009). Assessment tools for adult bipolar disorder. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 16(2), 188–201. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01158.x] [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01158.x]
15. Mohammad-Khani P. J. M., Jahani Tabesh, A., & Tamanaie-far, S. (2013). [Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR (Persian)]. Tehran: Danjeh Publication.
16. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. (2011). Kaplan and Sadock's synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
17. Sammarco, A. (2016). Women's health issues across the life cycle. Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
18. Segal, D. L., Kabacoff, R. I., Hersen, M., Van Hasselt, V. B., & Ryan, C. (1995). Update on the reliability of diagnosis in older psychiatric outpatients using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 1(4), 313-21.
19. Torres, I., Garriga, M., Sole, B., Bonnín, C. M., Corrales, M., Jiménez, E., et al. (2018). Functional impairment in adult bipolar disorder with ADHD. Journal of Affective Disorders. 227, 117-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.037] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.037]
20. Trull, T., & Prinstein, M. (2012). Clinical psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
21. Turkoz, I., Fu, D. J., Bossie, C. A., Sheehan, J. J., & Alphs, L. (2013). Relationship between the clinical global impression of severity for schizoaffective disorder scale and established mood scales for mania and depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 150(1), 17–22. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.047] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.047]
22. Van der Voort, T. Y. G., van Meijel, B., Hoogendoorn, A. W., Goossens, P. J. J., Beekman, A. T. F., & Kupka, R. W. (2015). Collaborative care for patients with bipolar disorder: Effects on functioning and quality of life. Journal of Affective Disorders, 179, 14–22. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.005] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.005]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
