چهارشنبه 7 آذر 1403
[Archive]
دوره 6، شماره 4 - ( 7-1397 )
جلد 6 شماره 4 صفحات 248-239 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghorbani Taghlidabad B, Tasbihsazan Mashhadi R. Investigating the Relationship Between Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Life Style With Stress in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. PCP 2018; 6 (4) :239-248
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-538-fa.html
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-538-fa.html
Investigating the Relationship Between Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Life Style With Stress in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 1397; 6 (4) :239-248
چکیده: (7077 مشاهده)
Objective: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a chronic, disabling, and functional disorder of the gastrointestinal tract in the absence of identifiable structural disorder. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between sensory processing sensitivity and life style with perceived stress considering mediating role of duration of syndrome in patients with IBS using structural equation modelling.
Methods: In this correlational study, 170 IBS patients (93 women, 77 men) recruited via convenient sampling method from gastrointestinal clinics in Urmia. The relevant data were collected by means of high sensory processing scale, perceived stress scale, and Miller-Smith life style assessment inventory. The obtained data were analyzed using correlation coefficient, and structural equation modelling.
Results: Duration of syndrome had a mediator role between sensory processing sensitivity, and perceived stress in patients with IBS (path coefficient reported 0.24, P<0.00, Chi-square value: χ2=0.01, P<0.001, goodness of fit indices (CFI=0.99, NFI=0.98) and standardized error (0.05). The same mediator role of duration of syndrome was not reported in relation between life style and perceived stress (path coefficient=0.06, P<0.001). Sensory processing, life style, and duration of syndrome explained 50% of perceived stress variance.
Conclusion: Results indicate that sensory processing sensitivity may be a temperamental disposition that interacts meaningfully with environmental factors in chronic illnesses. The relationship between sensory processing sensitivity and stress in an illness is best explained considering the possibility of contributory factors.
Methods: In this correlational study, 170 IBS patients (93 women, 77 men) recruited via convenient sampling method from gastrointestinal clinics in Urmia. The relevant data were collected by means of high sensory processing scale, perceived stress scale, and Miller-Smith life style assessment inventory. The obtained data were analyzed using correlation coefficient, and structural equation modelling.
Results: Duration of syndrome had a mediator role between sensory processing sensitivity, and perceived stress in patients with IBS (path coefficient reported 0.24, P<0.00, Chi-square value: χ2=0.01, P<0.001, goodness of fit indices (CFI=0.99, NFI=0.98) and standardized error (0.05). The same mediator role of duration of syndrome was not reported in relation between life style and perceived stress (path coefficient=0.06, P<0.001). Sensory processing, life style, and duration of syndrome explained 50% of perceived stress variance.
Conclusion: Results indicate that sensory processing sensitivity may be a temperamental disposition that interacts meaningfully with environmental factors in chronic illnesses. The relationship between sensory processing sensitivity and stress in an illness is best explained considering the possibility of contributory factors.
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
رويكرد تحليلي
دریافت: 1397/1/13 | پذیرش: 1397/6/7 | انتشار: 1397/7/9
دریافت: 1397/1/13 | پذیرش: 1397/6/7 | انتشار: 1397/7/9
فهرست منابع
1. Ahadi, B., & Basharpoor, S. (2010). Relationship between sensory processing sensitivity, personality dimensions, and mental health. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(7), 570-4. [DOI:10.3923/jas.2010.570.574] [DOI:10.3923/jas.2010.570.574]
2. Almquist, E., Tornblom, H., & Simren, M. (2016). Practical management of irritable bowel syndrome: A clinical review. Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica, 62(1), 30-48. [PMID] [PMID]
3. Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345-68. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345]
4. Benham, G. (2006). The highly sensitive person: Stress and physical symptom reports. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1433-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.021.] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.021]
5. Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equation program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
6. Boyce, W. T., Chesney, M., Alkon, A., Tschann, J. M., Adams, S., Chesterman, B., et al. (1995). Psychobiologic reactivity to stress and childhood respiratory illnesses: Results of two prospective studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57(5), 411-22. [DOI:10.1097/00006842-199509000-00001] [PMID] [DOI:10.1097/00006842-199509000-00001]
7. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67(2), 319-33. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319] [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319]
8. Cheung, G., W., & Lau, R. S. (2007). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables; Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296-325. [DOI:10.1177/1094428107300343] [DOI:10.1177/1094428107300343]
9. Chey, W. D., Kurlander, J. & Eswaran, S. (2015). Irritable bowel syndrome – A clinical review. The Journal of American Medical Association, 313(9), 949-58. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2015.0954] [PMID] [DOI:10.1001/jama.2015.0954]
10. Cohen, S., Kamarch, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385-96. [DOI:10.2307/2136404] [DOI:10.2307/2136404]
11. Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584-94. [DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.584] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.584]
12. Dickhaus, B., Mayer, E. A., Firooz, N., Stains, J., Conde, F., Olivas, T. I., Fass, R., et al. (2003). Irritable bowel syndrome patients show enhanced modulation of visceral perception by auditory stress. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 98, 135-43. [DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07156.x] [DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07156.x]
13. Drossman, D. A., Lesserman, J., Nachman, G., Li, Z. M., Gluck, H., Toomey, T. C. et al. (1990). Sexual and physical abuse in women with functional or organic gastrointestinal disorders. Annals of Internal Medicine, 113(11), 828-33. [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-113-11-828] [PMID] [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-113-11-828]
14. Dunn, W. (2001). The sensations of everyday life: Empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(6), 608-s20. [DOI:10.5014/ajot.55.6.608] [PMID] [DOI:10.5014/ajot.55.6.608]
15. Egger, G. J., Binns, A. F., & Rossner, S. R. (2009). The emergence of lifestyle medicine as a structured approach for management of chronic disease. Medical Journal of Australia, 190(3),143-5. [PMID] [PMID]
16. Evers, A., Rasche, J., & Schabracq, M. J. (2008). High sensory-processing sensitivity at work. International Journal of Stress Management, 15(2), 189-98. [DOI:10.1037/1072-5245.15.2.189] [DOI:10.1037/1072-5245.15.2.189]
17. Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of Personality (pp. 224-276). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Gannon, L., Banks, J., Shelton, D., & Luchetta, T. (1989). The mediating effects of psychophysiological reactivity and recovery on the relationship between environmental stress and illness. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 33(2), 167-75. [DOI:10.1016/0022-3999(89)90044-5] [DOI:10.1016/0022-3999(89)90044-5]
19. Gerstenberg, F. X. R. (2012). Sensory-processing sensitivity predicts performance on a visual search task followed by an increase in perceived stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 496-500. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.019] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.019]
20. Gray J. A. (1981) A Critique of Eysenck's Theory of Personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.) A Model for Personality (pp. 246-276). Berlin: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-67783-0_8] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-67783-0_8]
21. Hofmann, S. G., & Bitran, S. (2007). Sensory-processing sensitivity in social anxiety disorder: Relationship to harm avoidance and diagnostic subtypes. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21(7), 944-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.003] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.003]
22. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and functional issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.) Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 1-16). SAGE: London. [PMID]
23. Joreskog, K. G., Sorbom, D. (1989). Lisrel 7, A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS.
24. Kagan, J. (1994). Galen's prophecy: Temperament in human nature. New York: Basic Books.
25. Liss, M., Timmel, L., Baxley, K., & Killingsworth, P. (2005). Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to parental bonding, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(8), 1429-39. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.007.] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.007]
26. Lovell, R. M., & Ford, A. C., (2012). Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: A meta-analysis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology , 10(7), 712-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.029] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.029]
27. MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–26. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201] [PMID] [DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201]
28. Mayer, E. A., Naliboff, B. D., Chang, L., & Coutinho, S.V. (2001). V. Stress and irritable bowel syndrome. Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 280(4), 519-24. [DOI:10.1152/ajpgi.2001.280.4.G519] [PMID] [DOI:10.1152/ajpgi.2001.280.4.G519]
29. Meleine, M., & Matricon, J. (2014). Gender-related differences in irritable bowel syndrome: potential mechanisms of sex hormones. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 20 (22), 6725-43. [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6725] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6725]
30. Mertz, H., Morgan, V., Tanner, G., Pickens, D., Price, R., Shyr, Y., et al. (2000). Regional cerebral activation in irritable bowel syndrome and control subjects with painful and nonpainful rectal distention. Gastroenterology, 118(5), 842-8. [DOI:10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70170-3] [DOI:10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70170-3]
31. Meyer, B., Ajchenbrenner, M., & Bowles, D. P. (2005). Sensory sensitivity, attachment experiences, and rejection responses among adults with borderline and avoidant features. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(6), 641-58. [DOI:10.1521/pedi.2005.19.6.641] [PMID] [DOI:10.1521/pedi.2005.19.6.641]
32. Miller, L. H., & Smith, A. D. (1988). The miller-smith lifestyle assessment inventory. Bookline: Biobehavioral Associates.
33. Mulaik, S. A., James, M. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-45. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430] [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430]
34. Naliboff, B. D., Derbyshire, S. W., Munakata, J., Berman, S., Mandelkern, M., Chang, L., et al. (2001). Cerebral activation in irritable bowel syndrome patients and control subjects during rectosigmoid stimulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(3), 365-75. [DOI:10.1097/00006842-200105000-00006] [PMID] [DOI:10.1097/00006842-200105000-00006]
35. Neal, J., Edelmann, R. J., & Glachan, M., (2002). Behavioral inhibition and symptoms of anxiety and depression: Is there a specific relationship with social phobia? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41 (Pt4), 361-74. [DOI:10.1348/014466502760387489] [PMID] [DOI:10.1348/014466502760387489]
36. Smolewska, K. A., McCabe, S. B., & Woody, E. Z. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1269-79. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.022] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.022]
37. Sood, R., Law, G. R., & Ford, A. C. (2014). Diagnosis of IBS: Symptoms, symptom-based criteria, biomarkers or psychomarkers? Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 11, 683-91. [DOI:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.127] [DOI:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.127]
38. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins College.
39. Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 51-66. [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2011.641674] [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2011.641674]
40. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10. [DOI:10.1007/BF02291170] [DOI:10.1007/BF02291170]
41. Wood, J. D. (2001). Enteric nervous system, serotonin and the irritable bowel syndrome. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, 17(1), 91-7. [DOI:10.1097/00001574-200101000-00017] [PMID] [DOI:10.1097/00001574-200101000-00017]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
