%0 Journal Article %A Alsadat Makkiyan, Raziyeh %A Malekitabar, Mahmoud %A Farahbakhsh, Kumars %T Attachment Styles and Self-Efficacy in Blind and Non-blind Female High School Students %J Practice in Clinical Psychology %V 4 %N 4 %U http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-439-en.html %R 10.18869/acadpub.jpcp.4.4.237 %D 2016 %K Attachment styles, Self-efficacy, Blind, Non-blind, High school students, %X Objective: The present study aimed at investigating the relationship between attachment styles and self-efficacy in blind and non-blind female high school students in Tehran. Methods: The statistical population consisted of all female students studying in grades one or two in Tehran girl’s high schools, in the academic year 2014. The study design was causal-comparative, conducted on 120 subjects consisting of 60 blind girls selected through convenient sampling method and 60 non-blind girls selected through randomized clustering sampling method. Data were collected through two questionnaires of attachment styles of Collins and Read (1990) (RAAS) and self-efficacy scale (SEQ-C) of Muris. To analyze the data, descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multivariate analysis of variance) were used. Results: The study results indicated a significant difference between blind and non-blind students’ efficacy and attachment styles. Avoidance attachment style as well as emotional, social, and public efficacy of these two groups revealed no significant difference. Moreover, the results indicated a significant difference between anxiety attachment style and emotional, social, and public efficacy of these two groups (P>0.05). Finally, a significant difference was observed between secure attachment style and emotional, social, and general efficacy of blind and non-blind students. Conclusion: The blind and non-blind students are significantly different with regard to anxiety and secure attachment styles. However, their emotional, social, and academic self- efficacy seems to be the same. Although there was a significant difference between blind and non-blind students with regard to attachment styles, a significant association was seen between different dimensions of self-efficacy of blind and non-blind students (P<0.05). %> http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-439-en.pdf %P 237-248 %& 237 %! %9 Research %L A-10-427-7 %+ Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. %G eng %@ 2423-5822 %[ 2016