جمعه 7 اردیبهشت 1403
[Archive]
دوره 9، شماره 1 - ( 10-1399 )
جلد 9 شماره 1 صفحات 8-1 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khanipour H, Pourali M, Atar M. Prestige and Dominance as Differential Correlates of Moral Foundations and Its Clinical Implications. PCP 2021; 9 (1) :1-8
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-711-fa.html
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-711-fa.html
Prestige and Dominance as Differential Correlates of Moral Foundations and Its Clinical Implications. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 1399; 9 (1) :1-8
Prestige and Dominance as Differential Correlates of Moral Foundations and Its Clinical Implications
چکیده: (2300 مشاهده)
Objective: How people use social rank (dominance vs prestige) could explain different attitudes toward five moral foundations. This study aimed to investigate the differential relationships between prestige, dominance, and moral foundations.
Methods: This study was conducted on 150 participants who responded to the moral foundation questionnaire and dominance-prestige scale.
Results: Multiple regression analysis revealed that prestige was positively associated with four kinds of moral foundations (harm/care, reciprocity/fairness, loyalty/subversion, and purity/sanctity), whereas dominance was negatively associated with harm/care, reciprocity/fairness, and progressivism. Prestige had a stronger association with moral foundations than dominance.
Conclusion: It seems that dominance as a social status seeking-strategy is against any moral foundation, but prestige could increase attention to moral foundations in decision making toward every life issue.
Methods: This study was conducted on 150 participants who responded to the moral foundation questionnaire and dominance-prestige scale.
Results: Multiple regression analysis revealed that prestige was positively associated with four kinds of moral foundations (harm/care, reciprocity/fairness, loyalty/subversion, and purity/sanctity), whereas dominance was negatively associated with harm/care, reciprocity/fairness, and progressivism. Prestige had a stronger association with moral foundations than dominance.
Conclusion: It seems that dominance as a social status seeking-strategy is against any moral foundation, but prestige could increase attention to moral foundations in decision making toward every life issue.
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
روانپزشكي
دریافت: 1399/3/30 | پذیرش: 1399/5/20 | انتشار: 1399/10/12
دریافت: 1399/3/30 | پذیرش: 1399/5/20 | انتشار: 1399/10/12
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
