دوره 2، شماره 1 - ( Winter 2014 -- 1392 )                   جلد 2 شماره 1 صفحات 59-67 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Amini M, Pourshahbaz A, Mohammadkhani P, Khodaie Ardakani‌ M, Lotfi M. The Relationship between Five-Factor Model and DSM-5 Personality Traits on Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder. PCP. 2014; 2 (1) :59-67
URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-165-fa.html
The Relationship between Five-Factor Model and DSM-5 Personality Traits on Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 1392; 2 (1) :59-67

URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-165-fa.html


چکیده:   (1008 مشاهده)

Objective: Despite the fact that new criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD) were resulted from Five-Factor Model (FFM), there are a small number of studies that investigate the relation between proposed personality traits and FFM. Also, cross-cultural study in this field is needed continuously. Though, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the relation between the FFM and DSM-5 pathological traits.

Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study design. The participants consisted of 130 individuals with borderline personality disorder that were selected from prisoners (n=80), outpatients (n=35) and inpatients (n=15). They were recruited from Tehran prisons, and clinical psychology and psychiatry clinics of Razi and Taleghani Hospitals, Tehran, Iran. The Sample was selected based on judgmental sampling. The SCID-II-PQ, SCID-II, NEO-PI-R and DSM- 5 Personality Trait Rating Form were used for the diagnosis and assessment of personality disorders. Pearson correlation has been used for data analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 16.

Results: The results indicate that there is a positive significant relationship between neuroticism (N) with emotional lability (r=0.34, P<0.01), anxiousness (r=0.286, P<0.01) and impulsivity (r=0.229, P<0.05). Also, there is a significant relationship between openness (O) and emotional lability (r=0.316, P<0.01) and risk taking (r=0.193, P<0.05), and negative relation with impulsivity (r=-0.244, P<0.01), separation insecurity(r=0.194, P<0.05), and depressivity (r=-0.19, P<0.05). In addition, results showed that there is positive significant relationship between FFM and DSM-5 personality traits with DSM-IV-TR BPD symptoms (P< 0.01).

Conclusion: Results were in line with findings from previous studies and were explained in part by considering how facets/traits of the FFM and DSM-5 personality traits map onto the concept of BPD. Also, the present study helps understand the adequacy of dimensional approach to evaluate personality pathology, specifically on Iranian sample.

متن کامل [PDF 629 kb]   (656 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
دریافت: ۱۳۹۲/۷/۳ | پذیرش: ۱۳۹۲/۸/۲۲ | انتشار: ۱۳۹۲/۱۰/۱۱

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
کد امنیتی را در کادر بنویسید

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Practice in Clinical Psychology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb